Page 1 | 2 |
3
[Cliquez ici pour le texte en français]
The Miners at Home: The Emergence of the Coal Towns
While in other towns a range of activities were possible to earn
a living, in mining towns virtually all work revolved around the
mine. Ownership of the mine, type of management,
conditions of work, housing, retailall were determined by the
company. Individual workers were powerless and their well
being and that of their families were dependent on their ability
to continue working.
The lives of the miners were centred in the
communities adjacent to each mine site. Here,
miners and their families often made up the majority of the
population. While coal towns were shaped, in part, by a
working-class viewpoint, they were also marked by the presence
of the coal companies, and frequently became the sites of the
ongoing conflict between managers and workers. In some cases, an
independent middle class of merchants and professionals also
emerged to stand between the two starkly-opposed groups.
Most of the towns in which the
miners lived were founded by the coal companies themselves
between the 1880s and 1920s.1 Exceptions were
Edmonton; Canmore; and
Fernie, British Columbia, which were
already commercial centres before the beginning of mining. In
other cases, the companies engaged in rudimentary town planning,
providing infrastructure in areas where no communities existed,
in order to encourage the settlement of workers and families and
the emergence of a permanent workforce. Houses and stores were
built and made available; land was offered for the construction
of churches; educational and medical services were often
furnished. The result was a series of towns, in which long rows
of modest one or two storey, wood-frame, miners' houses
predominated, grouped around a main street consisting of small
commercial and institutional structures, built of wood or brick.
Most towns remained small in size until the decline of the coal
industry, their populations varying between a few hundred and
about 3,500. Most of these communities stayed dependent on coal
mining through their history. Lethbridge was a notable
exception, becoming a much larger commercial centre for the
agrarian southwest part of Alberta after 1900.2
As suggested before, these
communities were dominated at first by single men. For example,
in Staffordville, a suburb of Lethbridge, in 1901, two-thirds of
the population were males, and three-quarters of these men were
single. A. A. den Otter has written of the masculine ethic of
pride in hard physical work that emerged in these towns, and of
the interest in sports and the high frequency of violence and
fights that accompanied it. In the early years, drinking,
gambling, and prostitution were characteristic of these places.
Drunkenness was later linked to suicides, accidents, and family
violence in the Coal Branch.
3
In spite of these factors,
however, increasing numbers of women and families settled in the
majority of communities within a decade of their formation. By
1911, the ratio of men to women in the adjacent Crowsnest
communities of Blairmore,
Frank,
Bellevue, and
Lille had risen
to virtually the same level as the provincial average in
Alberta, 165 to 100. This pattern was repeated throughout the
coalfields. The increasing complexity of the communities was
reflected in the growing numbers of children and in the efforts
of the towns to provide adequate schools. The role of women
became essential in the individual households and the town as a
whole. Besides tending to their families, they often grew
vegetables and kept farm animals to supplement the family
incomes. They also frequently took in boarders and carried on
the charitable and church-related activities that helped to turn
these towns into communities.
4
The ethnic diversity of the
labour force has already been noted. Most towns possessed a wide
range of nationalities from central and eastern Europe and the
British Isles, though the particular pattern varied from place
to place. Many of the cultural groups were tight-knit. Most of
the Polish settlers in the
Crowsnest Pass, for example, tended
to come from the same agrarian area of Poland, and some probably
knew each other before their arrival in Canada. In some cases,
these groups remained separated in the coal camps. In
Coleman,
for instance, the Italians congregated in the central part of
the town, while the Poles and Ukrainians were concentrated in
East Coleman, and other Slavs in West Coleman. These groups
tended to form institutions which sought to preserve their
ethnic
traditions, and which offered a wide range of social
services of a cultural, recreational, and welfare nature. There
was sometimes friction between the AngloSaxons and the other
groups. In particular, some British miners argued that they
deserved preference over eastern Europeans for jobs and
advancement, especially during times of crisis, such as the two
world wars, or when economic prospects were bleak.
5
In spite of these factors, Allen
Seager argues that the impact of shared working and living
experiences was helping to forge a common identity among miners
by the 1920s. They participated together in sports and
recreational activities, as well as in other forms of cultural
expression, such as the brass bands that emerged at Lethbridge
and in the Coal Branch. They also shared common problems. The
high prices charged at company stores, for instance, led miners
in the Coal Branch and the Crowsnest Pass to open co-operative
stores. The unions became crucial in organizing workers of all
backgrounds in a common cause. Both the United Mine Workers of
America (UMWA) and the Mine
Workers' Union of Canada played prominent roles in refusing to
tolerate the attempts of workers to discriminate against each
other on the basis of ethnicity. By the 1920s, Communists, and
other militant leaders, were encouraging the formation of
working class institutions, such as the Women's Leagues, which
cut across traditional boundaries.
6
William N.T. Wylie, "Coal-Mining Landscapes: Commemorating
Coal Mining in Alberta and Southeastern British Columbia," a
report prepared for the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of
Canada, Parks Canada Agency, 2001.
See Also: The Coal
IndustryOverview, Rapid Expansion,
Domestic and Steam Coalfields,
1914-1947: The Struggling Industry,
Collapse and Rebirth,
Settlement of the West,
Issues and ChallengesOverview,
Entrepreneurship, Technology,
Underground Techniques,
Surface Technology,
Surface Mining,
Social Impacts,
Unions,
1882-1913: Unionization and Early Gains,
1914-1920: Revolutionary Movement,
1921-1950s: Labour Unrest and
Setbacks, Mining Companies, People of
the Coal Mines,
The Middle Class,
Miners and Local
Government,
Politics and Economics ,
Environmental Impacts,
Health and SafetyOverview,
The State and
Labour Relations,
The State and
Development after 1918.
[Next >>]
|