Home
Social Landscape
Featured Articles
An Education for
"Character" in Alberta Schools, 1905-45
by Amy von Heyking
1 | Page 2 | 3 |
4 |
5
The enemies of progress, however, were harshly criticized. An award-winning
Canadian textbook used in the early part of the century criticized the character
and habits of native Canadians: "To the early Europeans the Indian was not an
attractive figure. They describe him as of unclean habits and without morals.
Master of woodcraft, he was seen at his best when hunting. Upon the war-path he
was cruel, tomahawking, scalping and torturing with fiendish ingenuity. A stoic
fortitude when himself tortured was about his only heroic quality."1 Stories
about the deaths of the Roman Catholic martyrs in New France were accompanied by
graphic illustrations and woodcuts. Students were encouraged to judge races and
entire-civilizations. The Standard VII (Grade 11) general history examination in
1907 asked pupils to "account for the unprogressive character of Chinese
civilization."2 Those with good memories would have repeated the explanation
contained in Myers' General History, the authorized textbook for the course:
"The Chinese in strictly obeying the injunction to walk in the old ways, to
conform to the customs of the ancient, have failed to mark out any new footpaths
for themselves; hence one cause of the unprogressive character of Chinese
civilization."
Students in the period before WW I learned that the qualities of
harmony and progress were best embodied within the British Empire. In 1912, the
program of studies directed teachers to assist students in appreciating "the
greatness, of the British Empire of today and our privileges as Citizens of
that Empire." Departmental examinations ensured that students could recite the
benefits of parliamentary democracy. In 1908 the Standard VIII (Grade 12)
history examination included these two questions: "The principal
characteristics of the English constitution are inapplicable in countries where
the materials for monarchy or an aristocracy do not exist.' Explain this and
point out the strong features of a monarchy. "The merit of the British
Constitution consists in the close union and fusion of the legislative and
executive authorities. Explain and compare with Presidential Government in this
respect."
The interpretation of British history included in these texts reinforced the
notion that the British Empire acted out of good and noble impulses and
therefore prevailed, while other nations and other empires were punished for
their greed and ambition. The Highroads of History series, after reviewing the
flaws in Napoleon's character, concluded that the British victory confirmed the
virtue of her position. Britain needed an overseas empire and safe passage for
her ships in order to become something more than a small state, while France was
quite capable of supporting her population without an empire and therefore lost.3
Other texts described the series of groups that invaded the British Isles and
over time had the good sense to become Britons: "The Normans could not overcome
Robin Hood, nor could they overcome the English people. They beat them and
robbed them, and put many of them to death; but the English people would not
give in. As the years went by the Normans became English, and were proud to call
themselves Englishmen."4
The connection of Alberta students to the British Empire was further
strengthened during WW I. During the war years, the schools reminded
students and their parents of the justice of the cause and their duty to the
Empire. Through the singing of patriotic songs, production of special plays, and
participation in wartime essay contests, public school students were encouraged
to do their bit for the Empire's war effort. In 1916, teachers in central
Alberta complied with the directive from the provincial Department of Education
requiring them to take an oath of allegiance.
The expansion of the cadet drill program in schools during the war years
reinforced the lessons about good citizenship and good conduct that students
learned from books. Cadet training had been part of the school curriculum before
the war, and was usually taught by British army veterans who entertained their
male charges with stories about their experiences in India or South Africa. The
students were outfitted in uniforms and equipped with old Snider-Enfield rifles
cut down to make them more maneuverable by shorter arms and
smaller hands. The drill these students learned was intended to stress good
health and obedience. Most boys, through their experience with cadets and
watching the returning veterans of the war, learned something about moral duty
and political obligations.
An education for good citizenship before WW I implied education for
right conduct. Pupils were explicitly taught the importance of virtues such as
punctuality, industry, truthfulness, obedience, regard for others and a sense
of justice. It was assumed that these virtues were associated primarily with
British parliamentary democracy and a specifically English character. The
political and economic challenges and unrest of the 1920s resulted in changes in
school content and a new understanding of good citizenship and good character.
The public demanded that schools address the challenges facing Alberta society
and protect youth from the social transformations resulting from new technology
and the increased influence of American popular culture. The result was that the
nature of education for good citizenship was redefined.
[<<previous] [continue>>]
|