|
Home
Social Landscape
Featured Articles
An Education for
"Character" in Alberta Schools, 1905-45
by Amy von Heyking
1 |
2 | 3 | Page 4 | 5
Educational writers of the period warned that students, if left to their own
devices, would turn to unhealthy idleness or deviant behaviour. Teachers could
prevent this unfortunate consequence by teaching children games and sports.
Writers concerned about the increased mechanization in industry stressed that
organized and supervised play would ensure that young people would be strong and
physically fit. Organized sports also taught important moral lessons, such as a
sense of justice and honesty. Sporting activities were described as "the most
perfect democracy" because participation depended entirely on the ability and
commitment of the student, rather than on the amount of money his or her family had.
The importance of sports and games in the curriculum and outside school hours
demonstrates the extent to which good citizenship was identified with the
virtues of good sportsmanship and good character.
Increasingly, however, encouraging students to play by the rules was seen as
an inadequate response to the opening political and economic crises of the 1930s
and 1940s. In the period before WW II, schools were accused of
indoctrinating students. Some people charged that teachers demanded intellectual
servitude rather than critical reflection, an essential quality of good
citizenship in the modern world. Schools had been guilty of encouraging a false
confidence in traditional economic and political institutions which had caused a
tremendous economic crisis, and ultimately, another world war. The public and educators demanded that schools
provide solutions for the problems of the modern world. The public confidence in
scientists' ability to effect technological improvements was transferred to
social scientists' and educators' ability to effect social improvements. A
teacher writing in A.T.A. Magazine argued that schools should take on the task
of restructuring society: "the accomplishment of that end will be a feat of
educational engineering, comparable in social importance to those great feats of
mechanical engineering of which the present age is justly so proud."6
What did these demands for new training in citizenship — as preparation for
the modern world — mean for traditional citizenship training, which had always
emphasized the virtues of the present system and the importance of fitting in?
History teaching which stressed the virtues of the past was seen as completely
inadequate to the needs of modern society. A teacher writing in A.T.A. Magazine
argued: "industry has been disturbed for three years by the clouds of Depression, and so far, no historian has supplied one practical suggestion for
the alleviation of unemployment, or one single thought to dispel the aura of
despair."7 Modern preparation for citizenship was centred, not on the teaching of
history, but on the teaching of the new social sciences which could provide
answers to the political, economic, and social issues plaguing society.
The social sciences and the new understanding of citizenship were part of the
educational reforms known as "progressive education" introduced in Alberta in
the 1930s. The best statement of the aims of progressive education came from Donalda Dickie, a teacher in all three of Alberta's Normal schools and author of
The Enterprise in Theory in Practice (1941). While traditional educators had
accepted the acquisition of knowledge as the primary aim of schooling, Dickie
insisted: "education, when all is said and done, has just one purpose: to
help people to learn how to live happily together in the world." Education no
longer referred to the development of an individual's intellectual abilities.
Rather, progressive education emphasized the social development of children.
Progressive education transformed the understanding of the learning process.
There was a new emphasis on learning by doing. Educators insisted that students
must actively participate in learning exercises led, but not controlled, by a
teacher. Progressive education therefore was characterized by group work and
activity-based, interdisciplinary projects intended to spark students' interest
and develop their academic and social skills.
Social studies was central to the philosophy of progressive education because
it allowed students to work in groups to solve contemporary social problems or
learn about foreign countries. Students in Alberta schools in the 1940s
remember projects on "China" or "Transportation," which consisted of taking
notes from books, drawing maps and pictures, and presenting what they learned to
the class. Because learning was understood as an active process, in 1935 the
program of studies abandoned topics in favour of a series of problems that
formed the basis of each social studies course. What problems did the curriculum
direct pupils to solve? Grade 8 social studies primarily addressed the
problem of Canada's relationship with the United States and the remainder of the
British Empire. The Grade 9 course took a much broader approach in asking
students to inquire into the problem of the impact of technology on the modern
world. High school students concentrated on contemporary politics, particularly
in Europe.
[<<previous] [continue>>]
|
|