<
 
 
 
 
×
>
hide You are viewing an archived web page collected at the request of University of Alberta using Archive-It. This page was captured on 17:45:08 Dec 08, 2010, and is part of the HCF Alberta Online Encyclopedia collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page. Loading media information
Heritage Community Foundation Presents
Alberta Online Encyclopedia
Pour voir davantage du Musée virtuel du Canada / See more of the Virtual Museum of Canada The Making of Treaty #8 in Canada's Northwest
HomeSitemapSearchContactAbout UsArtifactsHelp
1899 and After

Land Claims or Treaty Land Entitlement

   
blueberries The Royal Proclamation of 1763 decreed that First Nations should not be disturbed in their use and enjoyment of the land. It also declared that only the Crown could acquire land from First Nations, and only through treaty-making. The Royal Proclamation set the framework for negotiation based on co-operation rather than conquest. 

Treaty making soon became the main mechanism for defining the relationship between First Nations and other Canadians.   However, the last of the historical treaties was signed in 1923. At that time, the federal government made it a criminal offence for a First Nation to hire a lawyer to pursue land claims settlements. 

cabinAs a result, 100 years after the signing of Treaty 8, there is a large and ever expanding debate over land, jurisdiction and borders. Consequently, many issues remain around the decision-making process that effectively ceded huge amounts of land to the Crown and, as a result, the issues surrounding the authority and the upholding of those old agreements tend to become clouded.

From a First Nations perspective, even the semantics of these debates are important. Many First Nations groups prefer to use the term "Land Entitlement" as opposed to "Land Claims". The rationale being that the word "claim" infers a desire to take possession of something that is not of your ownership, and that the word "entitlement" infers that possession is not a question, it is a right. [continue...]

©copyright Heritage Community Foundation 2002.  All Rights Reserved.

Last updated May 26, 2002 by KP