Free
Trade at Red River
Page 1 |
2 | 3
After the 1821 amalgamation of the two trading
companies the predictable result was a monopoly held by the HBC. In the
1830s the Métis demanded more representation on the Council of
Assiniboia, which made key decisions effecting the Métis population in
the Red River Settlement. The council had no Métis representatives even
though it was the governing body for the region. In 1839, Cuthbert Grant
was appointed to the council. The Métis protested the HBC monopoly and
demanded no import duty on American goods as well as facilities for
exporting products.
In 1845 the Métis petitioned the governor of Red River for
recognition of their special status. Métis free traders were among the
most vocal in their demands for nationalism. Fear of a possible Métis
uprising caused the British to send troops to the colony in preparation.
In 1849 an armed body of Métis surrounded a courthouse where a Métis
trader, Guillaume Sayer, was being convicted for trafficking in furs,
thereby opposing the HBC monopoly. The trial ended with Sayer being
found guilty, but with a penalty that was not enforced, and the
conclusion by the community that the monopoly was broken. But coming as it did after
four years of constant pressure, not only in Red River, but in England,
it marked a transition point. In Red River and in the surrounding area,
the monopoly was effectively broken. The Métis could now sell their furs
for the best price.
[Top] [Back] |
Rivalry and Union(1821)/Seven Oaks
Free
Trade at Red River
Battle of
Grand Coteau
Provisional Government (1869-1870)
Manitoba Act and Scrip
Indian
Treaties
Post 1886: Rupture and Drift
Political Agitation (1870s and 1880s)
North-West Rebellion (1885 and after)
|