hide You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of University of Alberta using Archive-It. This page was captured on 18:06:01 Dec 08, 2010, and is part of the HCF Alberta Online Encyclopedia collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Heritage Community Foundation Presents
Alberta Online Encyclopedia
Women of Aspenland: Images from central Alberta See more of the Virtual Museum of Canada
English / FrançaisHomeThe ProjectSearchSitemapContactAbout UsEdukits

The Women
Social Landscape
The Region

Search for Aspenland Artifacts
 
Visit Alberta Source!
 
 
Heritage Community Foundation.


Property Rights Movement

QuickLinks

 
Property laws in the early 20th-century Canada discriminated against women. Married women held few rights to the money and property they shared with their husbands. This meant that if a husband died or abandoned his wife, she could easily lose all her financial standing. In divorce cases, a woman was not entitled to a share in the property nor financial support and, as a result, it was not an attractive option for women and many endured unhappy or abusive marriages. 

Many of the same Albertan women who fought for women's right to vote, also sought to improve women's property rights. Irene ParlbyIrene Parlby, for example, in her role as president of the United Farm Women of Alberta (UFWA) created resolutions in 1915 calling for a dower law that would grant women a share of their husband's property upon his death and legislation that would forbid a husband of disposing of property without his wife's consent. In 1917, the Liberal government responded to these resolutions, passing a Dower Act that guaranteed women a life estate on the homestead. Although this Act was a definite step forward, many women still criticized it for not allowing married women to own property in their own name and only guaranteeing women a portion of the land when their husbands died, not any of the other movable property.

More changes to property law came with the new UFA government. In 1925, Parlby introduced Bill 54, An Act Establishing Community of Property as Between a Husband and a Wife, into the legislative assembly. It proposed that all the property a woman brought to marriage or acquired as a gift or inheritance during marriage be in her name, all other property acquired by the couple during marriage would become community property. This community property was to be managed by the husband, but upon either of the spouse's death the property was to be divided equally between the living spouse and the dead one's estate. This bill was extremely revolutionary for its time and even many women did not fully support it. In the end the bill was not passed, instead the UFA passed another property bill in 1926 that did little more than increase the terms of a woman's life estate. However, Parbly's bill signified the amount of interest in increasing women's property rights and paved the way for future laws.
 
Featured Video
Featured Video

Now That We Are Persons - Part II © 1989 Canadian Filmmakers Distribution

This excerpt discusses the reasons and events leading up to the gathering of the Famous 5 to appeal to the Supreme Court to clarify Section 24 of the British North America Act.

Watch Now!   Read Transcript

 

Sources:

  • McManus, Sheila. "Gender(ed) Tensions in the Work and Politics of Alberta Farm Women, 1905-29."  Telling Tales.  Eds. Catherine Cavanaugh and Randi Warne.  Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2000.


 

  
Back
Top

Copyright © 2002 Heritage Community Foundation All Rights Reserved


Albertasource.ca | Contact Us | Partnerships
            For more on women and Western settlement, visit Peel’s Prairie Provinces.
Copyright © Heritage Communty Foundation All Rights Reserved