|
Home
Social Landscape
Featured Articles
Modesty and Meaning: Women in Alberta Local Histories
by Nanci Langford, Ph.D.
1 | Page
2 | 3 |
4
Pictures of women available in public collections, such as archives and
museums, are few in number compared to those available in private family
collections. The community history makes it possible for many pictures from
private collections to be shared in public records. Many images of women, in
groups, and individuals, would never be available for public education except
for their inclusion in community histories. The most common type of photograph
is the family portrait, followed by posed group photos of women in
organizations, or participating in a particular event, such as the opening of a
church. The rarest are pictures of women alone or spontaneous photos of women
doing their daily tasks, alone or in groups. A delightful but small collection
of photos called “Women at Work” is found in the South Edmonton Saga. The
editors gathered and placed together on a series of pages a variety of
photographs demonstrating the broad range of women’s work activities in rural
Alberta over four decades. These photos document what has often rendered
invisible by popular accounts of women’s lives. Sylvan Lake’s history Sod Shacks
and Wagon Tracks offers a sampling of “fashion” photos over several decades,
although this series of photos would be enhanced by providing more examples from
each period. When I look at women’s clothing in these photos and the high
standards of dress they had to maintain, I am even more impressed with the
effort women expended in laundering and pressing clothes under less than ideal
conditions when water and other supplies were at a premium. Photographs tell us,
more than words sometimes, of the diversity and scope of women’s work and
leisure activities, and provide a sample of those moments and activities deemed
significant enough to photograph. Perhaps it was because women’s work activities
seemed so commonplace and unattractive compared to the composed family portrait
where all were dressed in their finest, that they were infrequently recorded on
film. Cameras were also rare in the early years of settlement and families were
too busy doing the work to stop and photograph each other performing daily
tasks. Those that we have of women at work are treasures indeed.
Accounts of families of the district, usually written by a living family
member, make up the bulk of community histories. Their quality and style vary,
but usually they are accounts of arrival, marriages, births, deaths, occupations
and locations and occasional tragedies or successes. There is no way to
ascertain how the family and its members interacted with the community, and
contributed socially and materially to each other or their neighbours. One of
Styles’ criticisms is of their uniformity, which seems surprising at first, when
thousands of people are producing them over a period of fifty years. When I read
these family stories I wonder which families have been left out? Were there
Native, Metis, Chinese or other families integral to the life of the community
who have been overlooked?
There are many factors that contribute to this uniformity. One is the reality
that most community histories were developed by volunteer committees, and the
format they chose, to have many authors writing family accounts, was the most
efficient way to obtain comprehensive coverage of the community. Despite advice
from consultants and experts, the family story format has remained a popular
choice through three decades of publications. Another contributing factor to
their popularity may be that communities used the history books of other
communities as models for their own histories. It makes sense that there would
be a competitive atmosphere and a sharing around the creation of these
histories. Prizes were awarded by a number of organizations and by government
for outstanding histories. This type of competition engenders uniformity, not
uniqueness. The neighbouring community becomes the standard to both emulate and
to better.
There are differences between community histories, and many communities are
blessed with several publications which record their story. Red Deer has a
collection of histories, written at different times and in different styles. One
is by the Ridgewood Women’s Institute, who used the opportunity to highlight the
history of their Institute branch in the first chapter. They won a national
award for their publication. The most noticeable differences are those found by
comparing single-authored books with those written by committees, committees
being the most common. These histories are similar both in the ways in which
they are organized, and in the way the settlement period in particular is
remembered. Their uniformity suggests a popularized collective memory has guided
their creation.
[<<previous] [continue>>]
|
|