This is an archived version of the Road Star Clinic. The Road Star Clinic can now be found at www.roadstarclinic.com. Please join us there!

Road Star Forum
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Re:Fatter Front Tire
#803439
Horsehammerr (User)
Gold Boarder
Posts: 847
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
What is the problem with a fatter front tire ? What size would be best ? I just like the equal more balanced look. I also think the weight of this bike justifies a bigger front tire, this is not a show bike.
 
Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2014/07/30 09:43 By Horsehammerr.
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803453
Flashback (Moderator)
Just the facts, Ma'am..
Moderator
Posts: 10749
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male Location: Tennessee
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
There are a few that have gone that way, I think a 150 has been used with no problems....
 
Logged Logged  
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803456
jd750ace (User)
Front toward enemy
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 18763
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male jd750ace Location: Waxahachie Texas Birthdate: 1969-10-30
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
It has been done by many with no adverse effect. My issue with doing things just for looks is if it adds weight but no functional advantages then it's hard to justify in my mind. Does not necessarily make it a problem. I think Darn has a big front, and several more.
 
Logged Logged  
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803458
Tug (User)
RIDE FREE. LIVE FREE.
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 9855
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
jd750ace wrote:
It has been done by many with no adverse effect. My issue with doing things just for looks is if it adds weight but no functional advantages then it's hard to justify in my mind. Does not necessarily make it a problem. I think Darn has a big front, and several more.

These things don't even come close to being sport bikes so a couple extra pounds with bigger tires will not hurt their performance. Especially considering that many people add hard bags, fairings, and trunks. So why do you constantly speak out against it? I'm not busting your chops, just curious is all.
 
Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803461
Flashback (Moderator)
Just the facts, Ma'am..
Moderator
Posts: 10749
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male Location: Tennessee
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
JD is just one of those folks who is anal on the "function over form" doctrine....He didn't knock the Idea............
 
Logged Logged  
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803462
Horsehammerr (User)
Gold Boarder
Posts: 847
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
Flashback wrote:
There are a few that have gone that way, I think a 150 has been used with no problems....150/? I'm very new to the Roadstar and hate to make mistakes because I didn't research enough.
 
Logged Logged  
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803463
smokescreens (User)
lifes better riding twins
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 17430
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male Location: harrison twp,  mi Birthdate: 1982-08-26
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
Like flashback said, and i think thats his profession just showing thru by force of habit personally i kinda dig the fat tires as well.
 
Logged Logged  
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803464
jd750ace (User)
Front toward enemy
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 18763
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male jd750ace Location: Waxahachie Texas Birthdate: 1969-10-30
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
Stock sizes have ample capacity for the job in most cases. Adding more tire weight that never touches the ground and does not enhance hadling, stability, traction, or safety just does not compute. Not to mention a 3.5 inch wheel is prescribed for a 150, not a 3.0 inch. The tire won't achieve optimal dimensions when inflated. I guess I'm just too much of a stckler for details. Maybe someone that is considering it is not aware, and would appreciate the perspective. As with dark side, hard tail, itty bitty or no signals, spoolie fronts with skinny tires, etc., sometimes folks don't consider all the variables and might appreciate a broader perspective. I'm not saying don't do it, just relaying my thoughts on things to consider.
As far as looks, yeah, they look cool.
 
Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2014/07/30 09:58 By jd750ace.
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803474
Agpilot (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 1568
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
I am runing the 150/80/16 on the front. and a 160 on the rear. Have for a few years. I tend to get better mileage out of them than the stock tire sizes. May be due to the fact that I carry a good load most of the time on road trips. It definetly makes my bike more stable in strong winds and with buffeting by interstate trucks. I tried to ride with a 130 front and 140 rear, not enough ground clearance, and bike was twitchy. Felt bad enough I removed them in about 2500 miles. I will stick with the larger tires. I understand what JD is saying but our riding styles are different, and I don't like my floor boards dragging in every curve.
 
Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2014/07/30 10:21 By Agpilot.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#803477
Horsehammerr (User)
Gold Boarder
Posts: 847
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Fatter Front Tire 3 Years, 7 Months ago  
Agpilot wrote:
I am runing the 150/80/16 on the front. and a 160 on the rear. Have for a few years. I tend to get better mileage out of them than the stock tire sizes. May be due to the fact that I carry a good load most of the time on road trips. It definetly makes my bike more stable in strong winds and with buffeting by interstate trucks. I tried to ride with a 130 front and 140 rear, not enough ground clearance, and bike was twitchy. Felt bad enough I removed them in about 2500 miles. I will stick with the larger tires. I understand what JD is saying but our riding styles are different, and I don't like my floor boards dragging in every curve.EXACTLY !! Thanks and on the Tire Conversion list in Tech Articles it says we have a 5.00/5.10 front wheel, as in inches. Not 3.5 or 3 inches.
 
Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2014/07/30 10:33 By Horsehammerr.
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop
...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... -->
New Forum Posts


The Road Star Clinic is a collaborative community of riders who archive and publish user contributed technical data about Yamaha Road Star motorcycles.

Copyright 2003-2007 Road Star Clinic and its respective authors.
<-- -->