By William N. T. Wylie
[Cliquez ici pour le texte en français]
The state intervened repeatedly
in labour relations because of the political sensitivity of the
industry, and its perceived importance in the regional and
national context. As we have seen in the chapter on
labour-local, provincial and federal officials were all involved
in discouraging work stoppages, insuring continued coal
production, and, after 1918, also suppressing labour radicalism.
In so doing, these officials revealed an enduring belief in
industrial capitalism, tempered by a willingness to tolerate a
unionized workforce pursuing moderate goals.
Because of the economic
importance of the industry, the state sought to minimize strikes
and maintain production. The three levels of government tended
to do this in different ways. Local officials-often businessmen
or professionals who were sympathetic to the companies-sometimes
brought in the police to protect strikebreakers. We have already
noted an instance of this at Fernie in 1903. The provincial and
federal governments, on the other hand, were willing to placate
moderate unionists in order to encourage labour peace, and in
the case of Alberta, to win their political support. After 1905,
Alberta introduced a series of legislative reforms intended to
please organized labour, including the eight-hour day, a
requirement for companies to build miners' wash houses, and a
measure requiring miners to be certified. The federal government
intervened in specific disputes to protect the national interest
in coal production. Mackenzie King, the chief figure here, was
involved in seeking compromise-not only before 1911, but also
when he was prime minister, during the labour disputes of 1922
and 1924. He was also largely responsible for the Industrial
Disputes Investigation Act of 1907, a legislative attempt to
establish mandatory conciliation in labour conflicts of national
importance. In addition, Ottawa was willing to be more decisive
in times of crisis, imposing settlements designed to placate
miners during the First and Second World Wars.
1
When dealing with labour
radicalism, state official of all levels were inflexible.
Believing the future of the established social and political
order hung in the balance, they mounted a series of attacks on
radicals, starting with the One Big Union, and continuing with
the Communist Party, and other radical groups in the 1920s and
30s. The goal here was to crush radical unionists in order to
preserve political democracy and the capitalist social order.
The coal industry became a prime target because of its high
profile and the extent of radical influence among its workforce.
In 1919, as we have seen, the federal government was willing to
support moderate unionism in order to thwart the OBU,
negotiating an agreement excluding OBU supporters, and giving
the more conservative United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) a "closed shop" in the industry.
2
The power of the state was also
exerted through the police and the courts. In 1925, for example,
radical miners in the Drumheller Valley became dissatisfied with
the UMWA, formed the more militant Red Deer Valley Miners'
Union, and struck for better wages. The province reacted by
sending in the Alberta Provincial Police to aid strikebreakers
and stop the spread of revolutionary ideas. The courts also
intervened, handing down a sweeping injunction against the
left-wing union. In 1931, the Mine Workers' Union of Canada,
which had formally affiliated with the Communist-led Workers'
Unity League, became one of the targets of a concerted
anticommunist government campaign. Following the intervention of
the RCMP in a MWUC coal strike at Bienfait and Estevan,
Saskatchewan, a court judgment declared the union an "unlawful
association."3
Throughout the inter-war period,
agents of the state worked to discourage Communist organizers in
the coalfields. The goal was not to destroy the labour movement,
but insure that it operated within established social and
political boundaries.
William N.T. Wylie, "Coal-Mining Landscapes:
Commemorating Coal Mining in Alberta and Southeastern British
Columbia," a report prepared for the Historic Sites and
Monuments Board of Canada, Parks Canada Agency, 2001.
See Also:
The Coal
IndustryOverview, Rapid Expansion,
Domestic and Steam Coalfields,
1914-1947: The Struggling Industry,
Collapse and Rebirth,
Settlement of the West,
Issues and ChallengesOverview,
Entrepreneurship, Technology,
Underground Techniques,
Surface Technology,
Surface Mining,
Social Impacts,
Unions,
1882-1913: Unionization and Early Gains,
1914-1920: Revolutionary Movement,
1921-1950s: Labour Unrest and
Setbacks, Mining Companies, People of
the Coal Mines,
The Middle Class,
Miners and Local
Government,
Politics and Economics ,
Environmental Impacts,
Health and SafetyOverview, The State and
Labour Relations,
The State and
Development after 1918
|