<
 
 
 
 
×
>
hide You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United States Department of Agriculture using Archive-It. This page was captured on 00:08:41 Sep 04, 2011, and is part of the USDA Economic Research Service collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page. Loading media information
Amber Waves cover, June 2009
Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America

June 2009

| United States Department of Agriculture | Economic Research Service
Search   GO!  
Current Issue
All Issues
spacer Amber Waves Home
  Feature Articles

Findings

Statistics
  Online Exclusives
  About Amber Waves
  E-mail notices
   

Farm Bill Resources

ERS Newsroom

 

USDA's Economic Research Service

Ad: Print Edition
Click here to subscribe to Amber Waves
Read more about our awards

 

 


Print this page Print | E-mail this link E-mail | Bookmark & Share Bookmark/share | Translate this page Translate | Text only Text only | resize text smallresize text mediumresize text large

Data Feature Heading

SNAP Benefits and Eating Out: Wise Choices Required

Photo: Family eating outEach month, USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program) provides 35 million low-income people with benefits to purchase approved foods at authorized foodstores. SNAP benefit levels are based on USDA’s Thrifty Food Plan (TFP)—comprised of low-cost foods that meet the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and deviate as little as possible from the consumption patterns of the low-income population.

A major restriction of the TFP is that it does not include foods purchased at fast food, takeout, or sitdown restaurants. A typical low-income household spent about 27 percent of its food budget on away-from-home foods in 2002. Like upper income households, who spend almost half of their food budget on food away from home, many low-income households turn to restaurant meals in part to help save time. Previous ERS research has shown that many away-from-home foods are high in total and saturated fats and low in dietary fiber, calcium, and iron. However, healthy food choices, such as low-fat milk, apple slices, and some salads, are increasingly available in away-from-home eating places.

Using 2001-02 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, researchers at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and USDA examined the effect on diet quality and costs of including food-away-from-home options in the TFP. When healthy eating-out choices were incorporated into a hypothetical food plan that allows at-home and away-from-home foods, the result was a diet that met the Dietary Guidelines. The estimated cost of the hypothetical TFP, however, was higher. At 2001-02 prices, eating one meal per week away from home would increase the cost of the TFP by 7 percent.

Allowing SNAP participants to use their benefits to purchase food away from home is not likely to result in the healthy food choices found by the researchers’ model. Most U.S. households make poorer nutritional choices than those recommended by the TFP and the Dietary Guidelines. Allowing for SNAP benefits to be spent on food away from home, which is generally nutritionally inferior to food at home, may help SNAP participants balance time constraints and other needs, but could also make eating healthy even more challenging.

This finding is drawn from . . .

“Food Consumed Away from Home Can Be a Part of a Healthy and Affordable Diet,” by Wen You, Ge Zhang, Brenda M. Davy, Andrea Carlson, and Biing-Hwan Lin, in The Journal of Nutrition, October 2009, Vol. 139, pp. 1994-99.


printer iconPrinter-friendly format Download PDF version