<
 
 
 
 
>
hide You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United States Department of Agriculture using Archive-It. This page was captured on 01:19:29 Jan 10, 2012, and is part of the USDA Economic Research Service collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page. Loading media information

February 2003 magazine cover

Amber Waves Heading

United States Department of Agriculture | Economic Research Service Search GO!  
Current Issue

All Issues

In this issue

spacer

Up Front

spacer

Feature Articles

spacer Findings
spacer Gleanings
spacer Data Feature
spacer Indicators
spacer

Profiles

spacer

About Amber Waves

spacer spacer images
spacer

ERS logo
USDA's Economic Research Service

AmberWaves February 2003 > Findings > Article

Print this page Print | E-mail this link E-mail | Bookmark & Share Bookmark/share | Translate this page Translate | Text only Text only | resize text smallresize text mediumresize text large

What If: Cash Instead of Food Stamps?

Kenneth Hanson

The 1996 welfare reform act dramatically changed the system of government assistance programs for low-income households. The new welfare system placed greater emphasis on employment and training, while altering the way cash assistance is administered. Specifically, the act replaced a federally run program with block grants to the States, allowing States more flexibility in disbursing funds to needy families.

The Food Stamp Program, however, remained a federally funded entitlement program. Still, proposals to further decentralize the program and allow States additional flexibility to design and administer their own food assistance programs periodically arise. Under one approach, food stamp recipients would receive cash in lieu of food stamp vouchers, giving them greater choice in what they consume. If implemented, such a "cash-out" could have some surprising effects on the Nation's economy.

Converting food stamps to cash transfers would trigger a number of economic changes. On average, low-income households tend to buy more food with food stamps than with an equivalent amount of cash assistance. For example, if a household receives $100 in cash assistance in place of $100 worth of food stamps, spending on food falls by about $15 and spending on nonfood goods and services, such as clothes and rent, rises by $15. This change in the household's spending patterns would in turn affect the production of food and nonfood goods, employment, household income, and taxes.

Cashing out a $19-billion Food Stamp Program would result in an estimated $3.5 billion-decrease in cash receipts for farming and food processing and a loss of 20,000 jobs in these sectors. Food stamp recipients' shift from buying less food to buying more nonfood goods and services shifts production in a way that dampens the demand for labor and reduces earnings for mid- and high-income households. The shift in production and lower earnings reduces tax revenue paid to the Federal Government. For the purpose of evaluating the impact of this policy change on household well-being, ERS researchers offset the revenue loss with an increase in personal income taxes. Thus, mid- and high-income households would feel the pinch of the higher taxes needed to cover the shortfall created by the policy change. The result: a change in welfare policy that is seemingly limited to low-income households may have ramifications that extend to other income groups.

red leaf rounded colored spacer
red leaf

This article is drawn from...

rounded color spacer

Tracing the Impacts of Food Assistance Programs on Agriculture and Consumers: A Computable General Equilibrium Model, FANRR18, by Kenneth Hanson, Elise Golan, Stephen Vogel, and Jennifer Olmsted, May 2002.

Read more about food stamps and welfare reform, elsewhere in this issue:
Food Stamps and Child Poverty
Rural Welfare Reform: What Have We Learned?

 

printer iconPrinter-friendly format Download PDF version