hide You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United States Department of Agriculture using Archive-It. This page was captured on 07:15:06 Mar 10, 2012, and is part of the USDA Economic Research Service collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page. Loading media information
Amber Waves cover, November 2008
Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America

November 2008

| United States Department of Agriculture | Economic Research Service
Search   GO!  
Current Issue
All Issues
spacer Amber Waves Home
  Feature Articles


  About Amber Waves
  E-mail notices

Farm Bill Resources

ERS Newsroom


USDA's Economic Research Service

Ad: Print Edition
Click here to subscribe to Amber Waves
Read more about our awards



Print this page Print | E-mail this link E-mail | Bookmark & Share Bookmark/share | Translate this page Translate | Text only Text only | resize text smallresize text mediumresize text large

Data Feature Heading

Child Health and Well-Being Differ for Metro and Nonmetro Low-Income Households

Photo: Child being examined by doctor while mom stands by
According to U.S. Census Bureau data, the Nation’s poverty rate increased from 12.3 percent in 2006 to 12.5 percent in 2007. As has historically been the case,
children made up a disproportionate share of that increase as well as of the total number of poor people across the U.S. The poverty rate is greater for children in families living in nonmetro households (15.1 percent) than for those in metro households (11.4 percent).

ERS research, drawing from the 2003 National Survey of Children’s Health, shows that on average, low-income households—those with incomes at or below 133 percent of the poverty threshold—scored consistently worse than other households on indicators of their children’s health and well-being. In most instances, members of poor households (incomes below the official poverty level) were more likely to give negative survey responses than members of near-poor households (incomes between 100 and 133 percent of the poverty level). For example, survey results reveal that children in poor metro households are 1.7 times more likely to miss school due to injury or illness than children in near-poor metro households.

The risk of poor physical and emotional health is often greater for nonmetro children




Physical & emotional health


Child’s general health is fair or poor



Child has asthma



Child has allergies



Child has socio-emotional difficulties



Child sustained an injury in last 12 months



Home, community, & social environment


Home, community, & social environment



Child is unsafe in school



Neighbors would not help child if hurt



Regularly spends time caring for self



Someone in household regularly uses tobacco



Source: USDA Economic Research Service estimates based on 2003 National Survey of Children’s Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The risks to the health and well-being of nonmetro children associated with low levels of household income, however, appear to differ from those facing low-income children in metro areas. For example, poor nonmetro parents were more likely than poor metro parents to report their children’s general health as being excellent or very good (72 percent versus 65 percent). They were also more likely to score their children worse on individual indicators of health. This included, but was not limited to, the share of children in need of prescription drugs or medical care due to chronic illness, having vision and speech problems, prone to asthma and allergies, diagnosed with attention deficit disorder and socio-emotional difficulty, and in need of therapy or counseling. Alternatively, poor metro parents were more likely to score their children low on environmental indicators of well-being, such as perceived safety in their school, neighborhood, or home.

This finding is drawn from . . .

Rural America at a Glance, 2008 Edition, by Lorin Kusmin, EIB-40, USDA, Economic Research Service, October 2008.

printer iconPrinter-friendly format Download PDF version