hide You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of Greenpeace International using Archive-It. This page was captured on 00:35:19 Mar 01, 2020, and is part of the Greenpeace Archive collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page. Loading media information

Europe rejects GM crops as new report highlights 20 years of failures

Press release - November 5, 2015

Brussels – All 19 government requests for bans of GM crop cultivation have gone unchallenged by biotech companies, pathing the way for two thirds of the EU’s farmland and population to remain GM-free [1]. The growing opposition to GM crops coincides with a new Greenpeace report reviewing evidence of GM environmental risks, market failures, and increased pesticide use [2].

Greenpeace EU food policy director Franziska Achterberg said: “Over the past 20 years, GM technology has only been taken up by a handful of countries for a handful of crops, so no wonder two thirds of Europe have decided to ban it. Where GM crops are grown, they lead to increased pesticide use and the entrenchment of industrial farming systems that in turn exacerbate hunger, malnutrition and climate change.”

Around 85 per cent of GM crops are cultivated in just four countries in the Americas (US, Brazil, Argentina and Canada), representing only three per cent of global agricultural land [3]. The Greenpeace report – 20 years of failure – highlights the main problems associated with GM crops, including:

  • GM crops increase pesticide use - Practically all GM crops are either engineered to produce a pesticide or to withstand the spraying of certain herbicides. Pests and weeds are developing resistance to these toxins, creating new superbugs and superweeds. This leads farmers to use even more chemicals.
  • GM crops do not feed the world - Studies show that GM crops do no increase yields and can affect the livelihoods of small-scale farmers, representing a threat to food security.
  • There is no scientific consensus about the safety of GM crops - Despite the biotech industry’s attempts to reassure consumers about the safety of GM crops, over 300 independent scientists dispute these claims [4]. Genetic engineering remains a risky technology that can trigger unintended and irreversible impacts on the environment and human health.

While GM crops struggle to live up to the claims of the biotech industry, innovative sustainable farming methods offer a viable alternative. Modern ecological farming practices are a proven and sustainable solution to the challenges facing farming. They prevent soil erosion and degradation, increase soil fertility, conserve water quality and protect biodiversity. Moreover, scientific evidence shows that growing different crops and single crop varieties in one field, as is done in ecological farming, is highly reliable in increasing resilience to erratic weather changes [5].

Similarly, modern biotechnology, like Marker Assisted Selection (MAS), can produce crops which resist floods, droughts and diseases and presents limited safety concerns compared to GM crops. MAS is also faster than GM in delivering new crops onto the market [6]. However, these alternatives will continue to be ignored if we get locked in the GM-industrial agriculture system, says Greenpeace.


[1] The European Commission’s list of notifications for national bans can be found here. The 19 European countries that banned GM crops represent over two thirds of the EU’s population and arable land. Greenpeace press release on national bans, 1 October 2015.

[2] Greenpeace e. V. report, Twenty years of failure – why GM crops have failed to deliver on their promises, November 2015

[3] Quist, D.A., Heinemann, J.A., Myhr, A.I., Aslaksen, I. & Funtowicz, S., 2013. Ch. 19 in: European Environmental Agency (EEA), Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation. EEA Report no 1/2013 pp. 458-485.

[4] Scientists’ statement, December 2013.

[5] Costanzo, A. & Bárberi, P. 2013. Agronomy for Sustainable Development: 1-22.

Denison, R. F. 2012. Darwinian Agriculture. Princeton University Press.

Di Falco, S. & Chavas, J.-P. 2008. Land Economics, 84: 83-96.

Diaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F. S. & Tilman, D. 2006. PLoS Biology, 4: e277.

Chapin, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D.

U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., Mack, M. C. & Diaz, S. 2000. Nature, 405: 234-242.        

[6] Greenpeace report, Smart Breeding: The Next Generation.


Greenpeace EU press desk: +32 (0)2 274 1911,

Franziska Achterberg – Greenpeace EU food policy director: +32 (0)498 362403,

For breaking news and comment on EU affairs: www.twitter.com/GreenpeaceEU

Greenpeace is an independent global campaigning organisation that acts to change attitudes and behaviour, to protect and conserve the environment and to promote peace. Greenpeace does not accept donations from governments, the EU, businesses or political parties.